An in-depth comparison of storage and database services across GCP and AWS. Covers object storage, data warehouses, relational databases, NoSQL, and caching, with the latest 2026 pricing and a complete service matrix.
| Category | GCP | AWS |
|---|---|---|
| Object storage | Cloud Storage | S3 |
| Block storage | Persistent Disk / Hyperdisk | EBS |
| File system | Filestore | EFS / FSx |
| RDB (MySQL/PG/MSSQL) | Cloud SQL | RDS |
| RDB (high-performance PG-compatible) | AlloyDB | Aurora |
| Global NewSQL | Spanner | Aurora DSQL (2024) |
| DWH | BigQuery | Redshift |
| NoSQL KV/Doc | Firestore / Bigtable | DynamoDB |
| Wide-column NoSQL | Bigtable | Keyspaces (Cassandra) |
| Cache | Memorystore | ElastiCache |
| Graph DB | Spanner Graph | Neptune |
| Time-series DB | Bigtable | Timestream |
| Item | Cloud Storage | S3 |
|---|---|---|
| Price / GB / month | $0.020 | $0.023 |
| Durability | 99.999999999% (11 nines) | 99.999999999% |
| Consistency | Strong (from day one) | Strong (since 2020) |
| Classes | 4 (Std/Nearline/Coldline/Archive) | 6 (Std/IA/Onezone/Glacier/Deep Archive) |
| Free tier | 5 GB | 5 GB (12 months) |
| Item | BigQuery | Redshift |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Serverless | Cluster-managed |
| Pricing unit | Scan volume $6.25/TB or Slot | Cluster hours |
| Serverless | Yes | Redshift Serverless |
| ML integration | BigQuery ML + Gemini | Redshift ML |
| Multi-cloud | BigQuery Omni | — |
| Lakehouse | BigLake | Lake Formation + Athena |
| Item | Cloud SQL | RDS | AlloyDB | Aurora |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supported engines | MySQL/PG/MSSQL | MySQL/PG/MSSQL/Oracle/MariaDB | PG-compatible | MySQL/PG-compatible |
| HA SLA | 99.95% | 99.95% | 99.99% | 99.99% |
| Performance | Standard | Standard | 4x PG, 100x analytics | 3x PG |
| ML integration | — | — | AlloyDB AI | — |
| Item | Spanner | Aurora DSQL |
|---|---|---|
| Release | 2017 (in use at Google since 2007) | 2024 GA |
| Consistency | External Consistency | Serializable |
| SQL | GoogleSQL / PostgreSQL | PostgreSQL |
| SLA (multi-region) | 99.999% | 99.99% |
| Track record | Google AdWords / Gmail / YouTube | New |
| Item | Firestore | Bigtable | DynamoDB |
|---|---|---|---|
| Model | Document | Wide-column | KV + Document |
| Primary use case | Mobile / Web | Time-series / IoT / analytics | Serverless APIs |
| Real-time sync | Yes | — | Streams |
| Scaling | Automatic | Add nodes | On-demand / provisioned |
| Pricing unit | Operation count | Node hours | RCU/WCU |
| Item | Memorystore | ElastiCache |
|---|---|---|
| Redis | Yes | Yes |
| Memcached | Yes | Yes |
| Valkey | Yes (2024) | Yes (2024) |
| Serverless | — | ElastiCache Serverless |
| SLA | 99.9-99.99% | 99.9% |
Which is cheaper, Cloud Storage or S3?
They are roughly on par. Standard-class GCS is $0.02/GB and S3 is $0.023/GB, so GCS is marginally cheaper. Egress is also slightly more favorable on GCS.
Should I use BigQuery or Redshift?
Pick BigQuery if you're in the GCP ecosystem (serverless + ML integration), and Redshift if you're in the AWS ecosystem. Both are leading DWH analytics products with very similar capabilities.
How do I choose between Spanner and DynamoDB?
Spanner = SQL + ACID + global. DynamoDB = NoSQL + serverless + AWS integration. Choose Spanner when you need transactions, and DynamoDB for massive scale with a simple KV model.
Which is easier to use, Cloud SQL or RDS?
Both are managed MySQL / PostgreSQL / SQL Server offerings. RDS is powerful when paired with Aurora, while Cloud SQL has the unique strength of AlloyDB alongside it.
What is the difference between Firestore and DynamoDB?
Firestore = document NoSQL with real-time sync. DynamoDB = KV with strong GSI support. Firestore is common for mobile/web, while DynamoDB is the go-to for serverless APIs.
What is the difference between Bigtable and DynamoDB?
Bigtable = wide-column, HBase-compatible. DynamoDB = KV + Document. Bigtable suits time-series, IoT, and analytics; DynamoDB suits general-purpose KV workloads.
How do Cloud Spanner and Aurora DSQL compare?
Aurora DSQL (GA in 2024) is Spanner-like. Spanner has a 10+ year track record, while DSQL is new. Spanner is often chosen for its proven track record and SLA.
How do AlloyDB and Aurora compare?
Both are high-performance PostgreSQL-compatible databases. AlloyDB delivers up to 100x faster analytical queries plus ML integration (AlloyDB AI), while Aurora's strength is its deep AWS integration.
Related articles & cloud comparisons
Professional Cloud Database Engineer (PCDBE): Guide (2026)
Pass the PCDBE exam — Cloud SQL, Spanner, AlloyDB, Bigtable, migration. The database Professional cert.
GCP vs AWS Compute Comparison: GKE, Cloud Run, Functions vs EKS, Fargate, Lambda (2026)
Compute service comparison — feature parity, pricing, ergonomics. The decision framework for multi-cloud.
Spanner vs DynamoDB vs Cosmos DB (2026)
Three globally-distributed databases compared — consistency, scaling, cost. Decision framework.
Database Migration Service Complete Guide (2026)
DMS features — supported source/target, minimal downtime, common migration patterns.
Google Cloud and AWS are trademarks of their respective owners. Please refer to each provider's official site for the latest pricing.
Practice with certification-focused question sets
View GCP exam prepNicheeLab Editorial Team
NicheeLab editorial team focused on data engineering and cloud certification learning. Content is structured around practical study needs and official exam domains.
Google Cloud Certification Roadmap (2026)
Choose your GCP certification path — Foundational, Associate...
CDL Cloud Digital Leader: Complete Exam Guide (2026)
Pass the Cloud Digital Leader exam — cloud business value, G...
GAIL Generative AI Leader: Complete Exam Guide (2026)
Pass the Generative AI Leader exam — Gemini, Vertex AI, Work...
Vertex AI Fundamentals for GCP Certs (2026)
Vertex AI basics every cert candidate needs — Workbench, Pip...
Associate Cloud Engineer (ACE): Complete Guide (2026)
Pass the Associate Cloud Engineer exam — Console, gcloud, pr...